
header caption
Dec 19, 2010
Graffiti veterans go after the big picture

Dec 16, 2010
Vandalism getting worse on public art in S.F.

Jessica Kwong, Chronicle Staff Writer
Monday, November 29, 2010
(11-29) 12:26 PST San Francisco -- Each new work of art in the city's public art collection exists to inspire appreciation, but over the last year, many pieces have been drawing the wrong type of attention.
Increasingly, sculptures, monuments and a diversity of public art installations are falling victim to the same disrespect that sidewalks, walls and street signs have long suffered - unauthorized graffiti tagging and vandalism.
"In previous years, an incident would happen every two or three months, but lately it seems to be ... happening monthly," said Marcus Davies, the Arts Commission's civic art collection registrar.
It's a growing concern because the commission has a mere $15,000 of its $11 million yearly budget to clean up the tags, carvings and other unwanted artistic contributions to the 3,500-piece, $90 million collection, said Luis Cancel, the commission's director of cultural affairs.
By comparison, the city spends $20 million annually cleaning up graffiti. The commission typically burns through its meager cleanup budget within the first quarter of the fiscal year.
Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/11/28/BAIR1GI6QJ.DTL#ixzz18ISmtEIb
Public art officials want more flexibility on Calgary's art locations
Officials behind Calgary's public art program want to ease the rules that force them to erect art pieces in out-of-reach city facilities rather than in more ideal sites.
The city and provincial formulas for funding public art have made Calgary unable to feature most public art anywhere except the site of a new construction project or infrastructure upgrade.
The system led to the wall of leaping trout that came with the Glenmore Trail-Elbow Drive interchange, and a $221,000 steel installation called "bearing" behind a chain-link fence at the fire department's northeast maintenance facility.
"We have a number of premier locations which would be ideal for public art, and yet there's no capital construction associated with those particular sites."
"As we look at a map of the City of Calgary, we have a number of premier locations which would be ideal for public art," said Charles Burgess of the city's public art board.
"And yet there's no capital construction associated with those particular sites."
Calgary's policy is to commit one per cent of construction expenditures to public art. A rule tied to provincial grants -- which fund most city projects, including the fire department's maintenance site -- mean the money can't be used off-site.
In fact, the city spends only one-tenth of a per cent of its capital budget on public art because it doesn't want to install public art at new interchanges and other out-of-the-way sites.
Beth Gignac, the city's arts and culture manager, said the municipality and province are trying to loosen those restrictions
Read more: http://www.calgaryherald.com/news/Public+officials+want+more+flexibility+Calgary+locations/3950203/story.html#ixzz18ISCOQ2z
Read more: http://www.calgaryherald.com/news/Public+officials+want+more+flexibility+Calgary+locations/3950203/story.html#ixzz18IS5mzS2
Dec 2, 2010
You Call That Art? TV program premiers in Seattle
Just an artist on a Harley, traveling and talking about art
By Nancy Wick
University Week
View a preview of You Call That Art?!
John Young has a vision of what happens when Joe Citizen encounters a piece of public art, especially if it looks more like the Broken Obelisk than the George Washington statue. Joe, Young thinks, is likely to turn to his companion, jerk a thumb at the piece and say, “You call that art?”
Which is why, when he decided to put together a TV program about public art, Young named it You Call That Art?!. The program debuted at 7:30 p.m. Monday, Nov. 22, on KCTS-9.
Young, a UW professor of art, will host the program, which is appropriate, since he has specialized in public art and about a dozen of his own pieces are placed in the
“There’s very little effort going on to educate the public about art,” Young said. “The TV show is all about trying to demystify public art for the common man.”
The show is, in fact, an offshoot of a course that Young has been teaching at the University for years. Officially it’s called Field Study in Public Art, but because it involves getting into vans and touring local public art, the students call it Van Go. Young takes them to particular pieces of public art and talks about the art’s origins, what the artists have said is the intent and who funded them. Sometimes the artist meets them on site and talks about his or her work.
Seattle, Young said, is an ideal place for the course, because it boasts more public art per capita than any other American city — more than 400 pieces outdoors and perhaps 1,600 inside buildings. The proliferation is the result of the multiple arts commissions that cover this region. There’s the city arts commission, called the Office of Arts and Culture; the King County Arts Commission, which is 4Culture; the Washington State Arts Commission, which includes the pieces built on the UW campus and the federal arts commission, the National Endowment for the Arts. Read more here.